Search for: "Adam Wagner"
Results 361 - 380
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Adam Wagner in The UK Human Rights blog has this to say…. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
See Adam Wagner’s commentary on the judgment. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
§2201 (Declaratory Judgment Act), is not disputed.See alsoPolk Wagner, again confused on patent law? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
A man been found guilty of public order offences for burning poppies and chanting “British soldiers burn in hell” on Remembrance Day. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
See Adam Wagner’s latest post on open justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:15 am
Warning for bloggers and tweeters as newspapers found guilty of contempt of court Adam Wagner, writing in the UK Human Rights blog, makes a few rather important points… Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 418 (Admin) – Read judgmentFor the first time a court in England has convicted two newspapers, the Daily Mail and the Sun, of contempt of court in breach of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, for the publication of a… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
See Adam Wagner’s post on this case here. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
See Adam Wagner’s post. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:58 am
See Adam’s post: That was the future of legal blogging Adam Wagner has followed up his earlier post with this…. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Image: Charon QC (In Blawg Review #292) Unfortunately I missed The future of legal blogging last night – a discussion hosted by a panel of legal bloggers David Allen Green (Jack of Kent / New Statesman), Carl Gardner (Head of Legal) and Adam Wagner (UK Human Rights Blog) and chaired by Catrin Griffiths, editor of [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:21 am
The panel was made up legal bloggers David Allen Green (Jack of Kent / New Statesman), Carl Gardner (Head of Legal) and Adam Wagner (UK Human Rights Blog), and was chaired by Catrin Griffiths, editor of The Lawyer. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:52 am
The panel will be legal bloggers David Allen Green (Jack of Kent / New Statesman), Carl Gardner (Head of Legal) and Adam Wagner (UK Human Rights Blog). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Controversial preacher Dr Zakir Naik has addressed the Oxford Union by satellite link, despite being banned from visiting the UK by the home secretary. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
And don’t forget our recent posts… Another former MP jailed for expenses offences February 10, 2011 Adam Wagner Prisoner votes: a ping pong ball in a wind tunnel February 10, 2011 Adam Wagner No right for prisoner to wear Easter lily February 10, 20111 Crown Office Row “Socialism in a single clause”: Public sector equality duty seminar February 10, 2011 1 Crown Office Row Justice in the age of insecurity February 9,… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
In the commotion surrounding the Christian hotel gay discrimination case, it is easy to forget that there is a long-standing principle that English courts will not decide matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
Strasbourg rulings First, at the risk of being repetitious – for Adam Wagner has discussed this in some detail – we need to clear up the point about the hierarchical relationship between the Strasbourg Court and the UK appellate courts. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In an entertaining post which also raises the serious issue of journalistic responsibility, the Nearly Legal blog has put a Daily Mail “family law expert” on the naughty step in relation an article on a recent Supreme Court decision on the meaning of domestic violence in housing cases. [read post]
