Search for: "Application of Stern" Results 361 - 380 of 594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Lynch, a criminal immigration removal case that “raises issues about the rule of lenity applicable in the interpretation of the criminal laws and … Chevron deference, a generally applicable administrative law doctrine that permeates virtually all of modern administrative law’; he also surveys the other immigration cases on the court’s docket this term. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
  The second is that application of such a rule by major platforms could lead simply to false content migrating elsewhere; which is also to say that platform terms of use policies may not necessarily be the ideal focus for addressing misinformation concerns. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
Indeed, in Thomas the Court underscored that “[p]ractical attention to substance, rather than doctrinaire reliance on formal categories, should inform application of Article III,”[15] while in Schor the Court weighed several non-dispositive factors in reaching its conclusion.[16] Yet in the Court’s last pronouncement on the subject in Stern v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by Charlie Dunlap
” Brennan told Congress: ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) releases a multitude of media products on a variety of platforms—including social media, mobile applications, radio, and hardcopy mediums. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:17 am
  Interesting findings: administrative litigation and enforcement actions are common where agencies are going to court to enforce fines and courts are rejecting agency application. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
”[5] It has applied this rule, moreover, despite the Supreme Court’s application of the exhaustion doctrine to conditional sales.[6]   The Federal Circuit’s approach allows patentees to transform a wide range of otherwise permissible conduct into patent infringement. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Candelora v Feser 2020 NSCC 177 Joshua M Arnold J awarded damages under the Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act SNS 2017 following a finding that the respondents had engaged in cyber bullying of the applicant. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:09 am by David Cheifetz
In fact, it's necessary for the efficient functioning of the legal system. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:54 am by admin
Ellison,  Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, Washington, D.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  The brief here has the names of my old adversaries who made that argument countless times, Mark Stern and Michael Raab. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:48 am by Howard Knopf
The Government had left a legacy of applicable case law and material on the public record that was available to any other l [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am by Matt Gluck
Rubenstein fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, joined Lawfare Editor in Chief Benjamin Wittes to speak about the progress of reform-minded federal legislation, states’ advancements in this sphere and what reforms we might hope for over the next year: Paul Stern proposed a path forward for congressional reform of qualified immunity that would distinguish between civil actions seeking to achieve change on the agency level and those that aim to punish individual… [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
That wariness translates from public policy to regulatory action through the application of Chinese competition law rules. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 5:58 am
Importantly, beyond the smartphone industry the automotive industry is the largest area of application of these patents, and many automotive companies (such as Volkswagen and Robert Bosch) have 4G and 5G patents declared essential. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:00 am by Hayley Roberts
Article 279 LOSC is clear that State Parties shall settle any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention by peaceful means. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Typically, D&O policies limit coverage for individual insureds to misconduct committed in their “insured capacity,” i.e., as a director, officer or in any other role or position pursuant to which they qualify as an insured under the applicable policy. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Moreover, the wholesale application of these doctrines to an impeachment inquiry, coupled with the additional, expansive arguments in White House counsel Pat Cipollone’s Oct. 8 letter and elsewhere, is unprecedented—and, in my view, demonstrably at odds with the historical understanding of Congress’s impeachment authority and executive privilege. [read post]