Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
(Op. by Ford Elliot, P.J.E.), the Superior Court reaffirmed the general rule that a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a claim filed against a deceased party. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
I complained back when the Supreme Court’s Perdue v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
The Court stated: “we adopt the two-part test articulated by the Superior Court in Terletsky v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:48 pm
The last article about the decision of the Superior Court of Ontario in Envoy Relocation Services Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:55 am
On March 31, 2008, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, decided the case Detective Sergeant Dean Ackermann v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court in a single case: Reisch v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, an interesting First Amendment question arose. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Superior Recharge's part-owner, Jon Blake, agreed to continue as general manager of the business for two years. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Otay Hydraulics, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
The judgment so rendered is a judgment of the district court, and is recorded and indexed as are judgments of the district and superior court generally. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court has just issued its decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
“As our Court of Appeal noted in Cloud v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:28 pm
See Schmidt v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 (Gentry) has been abrogated by recent United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:41 am
Superior Court of San Diego, Cal. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Superior Court (2020) 9 Cal.5th 642, 651 (Abbott Labs).) [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:20 pm
In a departure from decisions in recent years, the California high court has finally imposed some limits on the otherwise expansive reach of the Private Attorneys General Act, Labor Code § 2698, et seq. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
The case, Law v. [read post]
