Search for: "B. v. S." Results 361 - 380 of 57,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 5:41 am
District Court for the Northern District of California certified a Rule 23(b)(2) class for injunctive and declaratory relief but denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification under Rule 23(b)(3) because plaintiff failed to present a sufficient damages model as required by Comcast v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
How can you reach the "substantial" threshold on a gateway (b) defence/counterclaim when you haven't had sight of the claimant's papers which may (or may not) enable your gateway (b) defence/counterclaim to be made out? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
How can you reach the "substantial" threshold on a gateway (b) defence/counterclaim when you haven't had sight of the claimant's papers which may (or may not) enable your gateway (b) defence/counterclaim to be made out? [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:33 pm
Case Numbers SC 07 - 80 and 07- 354JOHN B. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Patently-O has a copy of the USPTO's appeal brief in Tafas v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:53 pm
  Party A files an untimely appeal and Party B prevails.Party B then moves for $33,000 in attorney's fees on appeal. [read post]