Search for: "Baker v. Speaks"
Results 361 - 380
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
John Fund v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
" Baker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Baker (1999) 20 Cal.4th 23, 33 (Delaney).) [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN (Excess Copyright) Comparing proposed class action settlements – Estate of Chet Baker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
Baker either appear himself or through counsel. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
” In Thompson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Trevor Carter, Partner at Baker & Daniels and Practice Center Contributor, and Dorothy R. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
Specifically, the analysis addresses how these limitations on the rule of stare decisis might affect the precedential value of Baker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am
Specifically, the analysis addresses how these limitations on the rule of stare decisis might affect the precedential value of Baker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Fairchild Semicond., et. al (Docket Report) District Court W D Tennessee: Continued marking after service of false marking complaint creates ‘rebuttable presumption of intent to deceive’: Baker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:00 am
Closing the session, and bringing a very busy day's conferencing to an end, was Ben Allgrove (Baker & Mackenzie), speaking on the recent England and Wales case law on extended passing off, as featured in the VODKA/VODKAT ruling last year by Mr Justice Arnold, upheld here by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
See Alden v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:06 am
Baker (1999) 20 Cal.4th at 35. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
Maybe I'm reading his facial expression wrong.The rest of the emphasis I could get from the proponents' argument rested on Baker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Two of this year's biggest attractions, however, lie outside the blogosphere: Tony Clayton (Chief Economist, Intellectual Property Office) speaks on "IP and Government Spending" and Baker & Mackenzie's Ben Allgrove, no doubt still celebrating the recent acceptance by the High Court that there is such a thing as initial interest confusion in British and European trade mark law, tackles the scope of the recently-extended tort of passing off. [read post]
