Search for: "Barrett v. Thomas "
Results 361 - 380
of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 9:37 pm
Martinac & Co. (1997), joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
” In Wayte v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:41 am
The second decision came in Torres v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
Justice Barrett wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
AFSCME and Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 1:25 pm
Justice Barrett's first issued published opinion in United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett at least slept on it before hitting "send" on the "join me" button, but none of them asked for any changes. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
Devlin Barrett of the Associated Press has this article on this morning's arguments in Perm. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
Lombardo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The vote to overturn Roe was 5-4, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joining Alito’s opinion. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm
The post SCOTUS Decides Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
At least that is true, I believe, given how Thomas applied the test in Williams v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
(For these purposes, I assume that Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett believe, as do the Chief and Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, that Roe was constitutionally wrong when decided.) [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 8:56 am
The case, California v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
(Justice Barrett did not participate.) [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:17 am
Justice Thomas concurred in judgment. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
” Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas concurred with the judgment. [read post]
