Search for: "Best Products, Inc. v. Best Products Co., Inc" Results 361 - 380 of 1,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing, would be enough to take the… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing, would be enough to take the… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Morgan Chase & Co. that “the job of underwriter falls under the category of production rather than administrative work. [read post]