Search for: "Bono v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 2:32 am by GuestPost
  As the article points out, clinical legal education, already a core part of the curriculum in many law schools around the globe – from the United States to China – has grown significantly in popularity in UK law schools in recent years. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the removal of those works from the public domain violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
O’Donnell came to court with pro bono counsel but Ms. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
(Picture, top left - the AmeriKat hiding in her shopping bag after a long afternoon browsing)RIAA lawyer to be next US Solicitor GeneralAnother change was announced last week when President Obama (right) nominated Donald Verrilli as the next United States Solicitor General. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Brennan, Jr. of the United States Supreme Court and to the Hon. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm by Orin Kerr
Kentucky and the United States are proposing a test that any lawful conduct is permitted. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Third, the theories offered by the state and the United States as amicus curiae are in my view far too broad, but the best answer is actually quite tricky but should be rooted in causation principles. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
Third, the theories offered by the state and the United States as amicus curiae are in my view far too broad, but the best answer is actually quite tricky but should be rooted in causation principles.By way of full disclosure, I should add that I was approached by counsel for King for advice, and that I provided pro bono assistance to King in helping to craft King’s argument. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by Adam Schlossman
   Most of my arguments have been in courts of appeals, only a handful in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Citizens United was the example. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by Beth Graham
  Most importantly, it was this principle that drove the United States Supreme Court to famously observe in Wilko v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Kate Bladow
Alvarez - Su Sie Ju, Bread for the City Volunteer Spotlight: DC Bar Pro Bono Program - Vytas V. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States (2009) and the immigration case of Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]