Search for: "Brown v. Branch" Results 361 - 380 of 730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Court annuls employee's unsatisfactory performance rating after finding that the rating lacked a rational basis and was arbitrary and capriciousMendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2015 NY Slip Op 07599, Appellate Division, First DepartmentA tenured common branches teacher [Teacher] employed by the New York City Department of Education [DOE] who had received satisfactory ratings since February 2010, forfeited her tenure as a common branches teacher in order to… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
On August 27, revisiting its joint employer standard, a divided five-member panel of the NLRB reaffirmed the standard articulated by the Third Circuit’s 1981 decision in NLRB v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am by SHG
  On the bright side, the number of words murdered in opinions has ballooned, with hundred plus page decisions common as compared to, say, an earth-shattering opinion such as Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Stephen Wermiel
Much of the work of the Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren qualifies, from Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
It considers his efforts to incorporate and supercede the jurisprudential insights that legal realism highlighted, the importance of his close relationship with Justice Felix Frankfurter, his commitment to the early civil rights movement and Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:20 am by Lyle Denniston
At this early point, there is no sign that the failure to implement the decision is equal to the “massive resistance” that had thwarted for decades, in some places, the court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Just as, in our era, prospective Supreme Court Justices must explain how their judicial philosophy approves of the 1954 Brown v. [read post]