Search for: "C. v. A." Results 361 - 380 of 62,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
Elgafaji and another v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (Case C-465/07); [2009] WLR (D) 59 “For a person to be eligible for subsidiary protection status on the ground that there was a serious and individual threat to his life, it was not essential for him to prove that he was specifically targeted, but it could exceptionally be sufficient [...] [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm by immigrationprof
In an interview to be aired on C-SPAN next Sunday, Justice Scalia defended his dissent in part in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Thomas Surmanski
 A similar issue was explored by the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An applicant for §207-c of the General Municipal Law disability benefits must show that the disability was directly caused by a job-related illness or injuryCaulkins v Town of Pound Ridge, 2015 NY Slip Op 07655, Appellate Division, Second Department §207-c of the General Municipal Law provides for the payment of “salary, wages, medical and hospital expenses” of law enforcement personnel disabled as the result of injuries or illness incurred in the… [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
  Live Blog International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
            We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:41 pm by Eric Goldman
May 3, 2022) The post Section 512(c) Protects Pinterest Despite Its Algorithms–Davis v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:32 pm
On October 9, 2007, the Court will hear oral arguments in Watson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:53 am by Leah Litman
A little more than a week ago, Carissa Hessick wrote a PrawfsBlawg post about the Supreme Court’s decision in Hughes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 3:45 pm
There's just sex and drugs missing from list but they don't figure in either the Court of Justice's judgment in Joined Cases C-338/04, C-359/04 and C-360/04 Placanica or the EFTA Court's judgment in Case E-1/06 EFTA Surveillance Authority v Kingdom of Norway. [read post]