Search for: "Childs v. Allen" Results 361 - 380 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 7:04 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The blue sentences describe the doctors discussing with the parents for medical care delivered to their child and the medical cause of their child’s death, which in this instance was the treatment provided to their child. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am by Sam Murrant
v Croatia – Reported on Mental Health and Mental Capacity Law Blog Failure to protect against disability related harassment violates Article 3 AA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB)Publication of photograph of child said to be fathered by celebrity breached privacy rights. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
A third parent of a child murdered in the Sandy Hook school massacre has won a defamation case against US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who called the 2012 shooting fake. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) have issued a reprimand to Birmingham Children’s Trust Community Interest Company after the personal information of a child was inappropriately disclosed to another family. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Ireland Cearta.ie has an article on the recent settlement in Carey v Independent News & Media, in which former Minister Pat Carey was identifiable from an Irish Independent article reporting a Guarda investigation into allegations of child sexual abuse against an un-named former Minister. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The EARN IT Act promises to pare back online service providers’ broad immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 1996, exposing them to civil lawsuits and state-level criminal charges for the child sexual abuse material (CSAM) posted by their users. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Geerken, No. 06-3987"A sentence for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court's use of a U.S.S.G. application note's 75:1 ratio for determining the number of images contained within a single video was not arbitrary and did not result in an unreasonable sentence for defendant; and 2) the district court did not err when it found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the child pornography possessed by defendant not only depicted minors… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Lorene Park
Either you will marry [the CEO] or I will marry your father and be your stepmother” (Allen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am by Maxwell Kennerly
App. 1994) (“Liability for defective design could not be premised on strict liability, but would require proof of negligence”); Lake-Allen v. [read post]