Search for: "Com. v. Lines" Results 361 - 380 of 652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The question presented in State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
  Trafficking in a Schedule III, IV, or V drug, in greater than bulk but less than five times bulk is still a fourth degree felony, but the presumption in favor of imprisonment has been removed. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:37 am by Andrew Frisch
Oct. 11, 2007) (citing Bazzle for the proposition that “arbitrators are well situated to answer the question whether contracts forbid[ ] class arbitration” (quotation marks omitted)); Scout. com, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    The litigation arises out of the IPO laddering scandal from the dot com era. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  Crawford was unanimous (although two justices concurred only in judgment), and the next decision in that line, Davis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Line of the week. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Much of that stems from the Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Boykin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]