Search for: "Commander v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Yesterday SCOTUS decided MEDELLIN v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:09 pm
The testimony was in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:37 am
" Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
The case involves complicated claims of federal versus state power, and the ability of the federal chief executive to command state courts. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In Mallory v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:06 am
" He relies on the Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:55 am
Barnett The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:06 pm
United States) is the European court system's repudiation of the British military justice system in Findlay v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
If it were not for Kentucky Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am
Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:00 am
Petersen v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:20 am
Hauge is using ERI’s manufacturing processes, he may be in violation of the patent laws or state trade secret laws, but he is not in violation of any “unequivocal command” in the 2001 Order. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 6:10 pm
’” Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
[Understanding NFIB v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Most media reports and early commentary on Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Holland v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
It is not an inexorable command. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:16 am
In Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
United States and Rita v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm
Note: Colonel Sullivan will be on blogtalkradio again at 2100 hours tonight with retired commander Phil Cave and Fogbow blogger Mata Mari to discuss today’s events. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
If the state chooses to intervene, the state attorney general commandeers the prosecution of the tax FCA action and the whistleblower retains a financial reward interest in any successful FCA claim.4 If the state attorney general does not prosecute or dismiss the tax FCA action, the relator is permitted to continue to prosecute the case on the state’s behalf.5 Generally, in a state tax FCA action, the plaintiff—whether the relator or… [read post]
