Search for: "Container Corporation v. CIR" Results 361 - 380 of 1,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Lombardi, 782 F.3d 963, 967 (8th Cir. 2015); see also, e.g., SanMedica International v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:06 am by David S. Poppick
Also, if a foreign corporation sells a product containing a trade secret in the United States, it may be prosecuted under the EEA as long as the misappropriation occurred in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
The implications for antitrust cases are significant and evident from decisions such as In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d 305 (3d Cir. 2009), In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litig., 522 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2008), and Blades v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
The DEA saw that 24.15.180.222 was an I.P. address frequently used to access the account, so it sent an administrative subpoena to Comcast Corporation (the owner of that I.P. address). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2007) the court stated that “[w]hile the specifica- tion must contain structure linked to claimed means, this is not a high bar. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Cir. 2009) (citing Amazon.com, Inc. v. [read post]