Search for: "D. Sharp v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
App. 2008); Estate of Sharp v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
On Friday 25 March 2011, Mrs Justice Sharp gave summary judgment for the defendant in the case of Bowker v RSPB [2011] EWHC 737 (QB). [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Young, court finds not raw material because D’s use involves marginal artistic innovation for putting Sex Pistols image in red; likewise not in Morris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm
Minott v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 45301 Olympia, WA 98504-5301 Phone: (360) 902-8001 (V/TTY), (800) 422-7930 (Toll Free) TTY: (800) 422-7941 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.dshs.wa.gov Eastern Assistive Technology Resource Center West 606 Sharp Spokane, WA 99201 Phone: (800) 214-8731 (V/TTY); (509) 328-9350 (V/TTY) Fax: (509) 326-2261 E-mail: Spokane@seals.org Web: http://wata.org/wata/eatrc/index.htm Washington Assistive Technology Center Washington Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
Reversing a lower court’s ruling that a 52-year old employee failed to show that he was laid off on account of his age, the Sixth Circuit found that his supervisor’s explanation about why the company retained a younger employee, in which he stated that he “had an opportunity to bring the next generation in, so that’s what we decided to do,” and that the company had a succession plan where “you bring in younger people, train them, so when the older people… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds, 138 N.J. 173, 649 A.2d. 853 (N.J. 1994)), and Snakenberg v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Democratic President Franklin D. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm
(I'd never have the patience to sail.) [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
(D.); CredibilityR. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Waradzin v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
In the Courts The libel trial in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers was heard on 21 to 25 May 2012 before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
In Telesco v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
” These were the words of President Franklin D. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
” New York v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
