Search for: "Does 1-152"
Results 361 - 380
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Helvestine, 256 Va. 1, 6-8 (1998); Glovier v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Ross, 152 A.D.2d 580, 543 N.Y.S.2d 162; Quintana v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
Sec. 1.152-4(e)(1)(ii). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Lord Wilson held that a status does not have to be a permanent characteristic: [38]. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
Sec. 1.152-4(e)(1)(ii). [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
Ct. 828, 1 L. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
-Dallas 2009, no pet.).RESTRICTED APPEAL AS A MEANS TO ATTACK A DEFAULT JUDGMENT WHEN NO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (OR NOTICE OF APPEAL) WAS TIMELY FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE JUDGMENT To prevail on its restricted appeal, appellant must establish: (1) it filed its notice of restricted appeal within six months after the judgment was signed; (2) it wa [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
” Id. at 152-53. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
152! [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
Code § 1499(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 6:44 am
” Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Winter 2014), pp. 152-175. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:26 am
No. 2011-152, § 1, 12-15-2011)_____________________________What does TPD Form 1056 (11/11) provide? [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am
Dental Products Co., 140 F.2d 140, 152 (7th Cir. 1944) [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
Under Article 21(1) of the charter, ‘[a]ny discrimination based on … age … shall be prohibited’. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Wyeth LLC, No. 09-152, 2011 WL 588789 (U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
(or .01 or .1). [read post]
