Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
My suggestion: In section 18(2) of O.Reg. 48/01 (above), replace the word "inclusive" with "exclusive. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
However, a government employee does not lose the right to speak out about issues of public concern in forums closed to the general public…. [2.] [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:30 am
For all other stations in Categories 1, 2, and 3, up to 100 percent of eligible expenses will be reimbursed. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:50 am
We disagree, finding the law does not require the inclusion of information about great-great-ancestors in ICWA notices, and any error in failing to include J.M. was harmless. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:35 am
Podcasts of interviews relating to the reports are also available (Segment 1; 2; 4; 5; 6.) [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:56 am
(Amended Order, p. 1; Final Judgment, p. 1; Lucido, supra, at p. 342.) [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
The inclusion of the required specialized studies being “directly related” to the position does not faithfully interpret the Immigration and Nationality Act I (“INA”). [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:33 am
Include by-laws or rules that have been repealed (despite the fact that s. 76(1)(f) of the Condo Act requires copies of the current declaration, by-laws and rules); 2. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 7:02 am
“[M]ere inclusion in Title 35 of the United States Code does not make a statute a patent law under which a claim may arise. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:24 pm
But rather, how does it affect the bottom line? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
For example, the Inclusive Prosperity Act proposed by Sen. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:08 am
Regular readers might have noticed that our blog has a couple of Iowa Hawkeye fans among the writers (Exhibits 1, 2, and 3). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am
The ETA included language in Sections 656.17(e)(2)(ii)(D), 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(3), and 656.10(d)(4) applying the content requirements of Section 656.17(f) to newspaper advertisements and notice of filings, but omitted such language in Section 656.17(e)(2)(i) addressing job orders. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am
The ETA included language in Sections 656.17(e)(2)(ii)(D), 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(3), and 656.10(d)(4) applying the content requirements of Section 656.17(f) to newspaper advertisements and notice of filings, but omitted such language in Section 656.17(e)(2)(i) addressing job orders. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Inclusion of a pharmacogenomic test in the labeling would be contingent upon its performance characteristics.FDA, Guidance for Industry, Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions, at 5 (March 2005) (available here). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
[2] ibid, at 18 [3] Yosie Saint Cyr, "Systemic Discrimination in Law Firms: Perception of Reality? [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
By Žan Berro Slovenia is a small country of around 2 million people at the crossroads of the Balkans and Central Europe.[1] It borders Italy to the west, Austria to the north, Croatia to the south, Adriatic Sea to the south-west and Hungary to the north-east.[2] In 1991, Slovenia gained independence from Yugoslavia and joined European Union in 2004.[3] It is situated at the junction of the Alps, the Dinaric Mountains, the Pannonian Basin and the Adriatic Sea.[4]… [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:00 am
The VCPR is established when all of the following conditions are met:1) the vet has assumed responsibility for making clinical judgments regarding the health of the horse and the need for medical treatment, and the owner has agreed to follow the vet's instructions; 2) the vet has sufficient knowledge of the horse to initiate at least a preliminary diagnosis of the medical condition of the horse. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 12:52 pm
SALMONELLA Food contaminated with Salmonella bacteria does not usually look, smell, or taste spoiled. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:51 pm
Applicants submitted that Article 4(5) of Regulation No. 1049/2001 does not constitute a right of veto for a Member State and that the Commission may not rely on the Member State’s opinion regarding the application of an exception provided for by Article 4(2) of that Regulation. [read post]
