Search for: "Does 1-237" Results 361 - 380 of 598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am by Kevin Johnson
” Section 237(a)(2)(B)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides for the removal of “any alien who at any time after admission has been convicted of a violation of . . . any law or regulation of a State . . . relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21). [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Only in the specified and limited respects does D.R.L. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:25 am by Jon Ibanez
Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1, held that DUIs are not, without other aggravating circumstances, deportable. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
This one  is part 1 of what will be a four part series, with the subsequent posts to be published every Tuesday (or so). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Stephens, 720 F.3d 231, 237-238 (2013) :Trottie and Barbara Canada met and began dating in about 1989. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
And under today’s decision they must be set aside.In fact, under the majority’s holding, it does not even matter if the attorney upon returning to the courtroom does object and does seek corrective actionbecause as soon as a single answer is given in his absence an absolute, conclusive, irrebutable presumption of prejudice arises. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Constitutional Law Found., 525 U.S. 182, 209 (1999) (Thomas, J., concurring in the judgment) (treating a law as content-based because “the category of burdened speech is defined by its content—Colorado’s badge requirement does not apply to those who circulate candidate petitions, only to those who circulate initiative or referendum proposals”). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Glenn R. Reiser
Rul. 59-60, 1959-1 C.B. 237, § 4.01).Generally, in determining fair value, the judge should consider “‘proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally acceptable in  the financial community and otherwise admissible in court. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Code § 1028A(a)(1) was not supported by sufficient evidence. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
In the scientific world, most authors recognize that risk, even if real and above baseline, regardless of magnitude, does not support causal attribution in a specific case.[1]  Sir Richard Doll, who did so much to advance the world’s understanding of asbestosis as a cause of lung cancer, issued a caveat about the limits of specific causation inference. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
This position gives rise to the following questions:1) Is the exercise of the power to promulgate Ordinances amenable to judicial review (is it justiciable)? [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 SCR 533 It is well understood that in Canada the grant of a patent is akin to a contract or bargain between the patentee on the one hand and the government of Canada (representing the interests of the general public) on the other. [read post]