Search for: "Does 1-24" Results 361 - 380 of 16,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2022, 12:15 pm by Unknown
Australia) - Pt. 1 (24 Jan. 2022)- Regional Focus: Asia Pacific (incl. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:40 pm
Judge Simon will cover Zilber (5) then Del Pino (16) then her own (1) on 12/24. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
Sept. 24, 2008); Does' memorandum at 16-17), and which vacated the jury verdict in the only one of these cases to go to trial, held that merely making available files for distribution is not copyright infringement, as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:33 pm by Anthony Zaller
(State exemption and specific subsection for exemption):____________________________ Even though the requirement for employers to provide paid sick leave does not start until July 1, 2015, the revised Notice to Employee and the poster must be used by employers starting January 1, 2015. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by But I Do Have a Law Degree
I have survived two major spills in the last 24 hours. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 1:10 pm by Giles Peaker
C v Oldham Council. (2024) EWCC 1 (Judgment can be found here) Hynek v LB Islington. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Allan Blutstein
Dep’t of Energy (D.D.C.) -- determining that: (1) agency performed reasonable search for records pertaining to plaintiff, a former DOE employee; and (2) agency properly withheld certain information pursuant to Exemption 5 (deliberative process and attorney-client privileges), as well as cell phone numbers and conference call phone number pursuant to Exemption 6.Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1999).For the foregoing reasons, we sustain the rejection of claims 1-11, 17-24, 26-43, 45-54, 56-58, 60-63, 66, 67, and 69-75 as anticipated byKuechler.IPBiz notes the following:Since we sustain the rejection of claims 1-11, 17-24, 26-43, 45-54, 56-58, 60-63, 66, 67, and 69-75 as anticipated by Kuechler, we also sustaintheir rejection as unpatentable over Kuechler. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am by Nico Cordes
Allowability of the objection2.1 Legal basis of the objection2.1.1 The appellant has not argued that there was any reason for exclusion under Article 24(1) EPC, nor does the present board see any basis for the application of Article 24(1) EPC either. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
If, for one of the reasons mentioned in paragraph 1, or for any other reason, a member of a BoA considers that he should not take part in any appeal, he shall inform the Board accordingly (A 24(2)).[2] Apparently the self-recusations that are to be examined here are not based on a reason for exclusion pursuant to A 24(1). [read post]
31 May 2015, 12:10 pm
Ask your surgeon how many times he or she does your procedure every year. [read post]