Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 361 - 380
of 9,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
6 May 2023, 8:03 am
But there’s a problem: Legal does not always work-and-play-well-with-others in the enterprise. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm
The case focuses on the statutory interpretation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
However, H.J.Res 59, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (“Act”) only delays the pain of sequestration; it does not replace it with a long-term tax and spending deal. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Doe, 35, delivered her third child, she continued to hemorrhage. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:59 am
§ 124.109(c)(1) in order for FPI to participate I the § 8(a) program. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 7:05 am
South Bend, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ellison Educational Equipment of California, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, Heartfelt Creations, Inc. and DOES 1-10 of Goshen, Indiana, infringed its rights in the United States Patent No. 9,079,325 (the ‘325 Patent). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:14 pm
A person convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for an offense under section 1 of P.L.1987, c.101 (C.2C:35-7), subsection b. of section 1 of P.L.1997, c.185 (C.2C:35-4.1), or any crime for which there exists a presumption of imprisonment pursuant to subsection d. of N.J.S.2C:44-1 or any other statute, or who has been previously convicted of an offense under subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:35-5 or a similar offense under any other law of this State, any… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
Hansen (representing AMP), the Myriad claim says they want "the isolated DNA of claim 1 wherein said DNA has the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID No. 1." [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:38 am
The car was traveling about 20 mph in a 35 mph zone. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 pm
’ 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 102, on „prima facie obviousness'under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
” Terry v Bayer Corp., 145 F.3d 28, 35-36 (1st Cir. 1998)(quoting Garren v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:15 am
Take a look.The BBC has a country by country analysis of the election results and we show below the fairly final but still officially provisional EU Election Results for all 27 Countries who elected 736 Members of Parliament (MEPs) representing 492 million European inhabitants (there are 375 million eligible voters):Provisional 11 June 2009 at 11:26 CEST EPP PES ALDE UEN GREENS/ EFA GUE/ NGL IND/ DEM Others Total BE 6 5 5 0 3 0 0 3… [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:23 pm
§ 112, para. 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:24 am
§ 102, on „prima facie obviousness‟ under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:14 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 1:45 pm
North Dakota: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:41 am
But what does it mean to grant the employee’s CTO request within a reasonable period? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
"Here, as well, this Kat has several comments: 1. [read post]
