Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 361 - 380 of 3,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 5:00 pm by Anna Mikhaylina
On August 3, 2022, the IRS released Notice 2022-33, which extends the deadline for plans to adopt: all SECURE Act[1] amendments, optional or required (a summary of SECURE Act changes can be found here); CARES Act[2] amendments relating to relief from 2020 required minimum distributions; and Miners Act[3] amendments lowering the permitted age for in-service distributions to 59½ for defined benefit plans and money purchase pension plans. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
The Claimant was given permission to appeal on the application and interpretation of s.3(1). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vi]  Plaintiffs filed a total of 59 securities class action lawsuits against life sciences companies in 2021; 6 of those cases were filed against companies with COVID-19 related products. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
  The panel noted, “[a] generic grant of rulemaking authority to fill gaps, however, does not allow the FCC to alter the specific choices Congress made. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern (Lubberger Lehment )
Also in 2011, Deichmann SE filed an application for declaration of invalidity of Munich SL’s registration based on a lack of distinctiveness (Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001). [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
In providing guidance on how to intend the concept of bad faith in these situations, the GC ruled out that in the specific case at hand the trade mark owner’s behaviour would be caught within the scope of application of Article 59(1)(b) EUTMR.Let’s see what happened.BackgroundIn 2013, Ladislav Zdút successfully applied to register the figurative mark below as an EU trade mark (EUTM) for goods in classes 18, 25, and 25. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision's reasoning refers to video frames at "0:00", "0:56", "1:02" and "1:11" and video frame sequences "0:29-0:52" and "0:59-1:02". [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
On 1 July 2022, summary judgment was given in favour of the defendants in Haviland v Lownie [2022] EWHC 1688 (QB) by Murray J. [read post]