Search for: "E. Arnold"
Results 361 - 380
of 980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 11:47 am
Company spokesman Chris Arnold said that the 43 shuttered outlets will begin doing business again on Wednesday, Nov. 11. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Lawlor, PhD, dean of the Brown School and the William E. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:11 am
Hawke, Robert E. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Gerald E. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:40 am
Assault with a Deadly Weapon Inflicting Serious Bodily Injury is a Class E felony in North Carolina. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law A: 300 E. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am
Experiencia amplia representando a compañías de telecomunicaciones en procedimientos administrativos a nivel federal y estatal, procedimientos judiciales apelativos y arbitraje domésticos e internacionales. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:01 pm
" Christopher Stothers, Arnold & Porter, London)* "A decade of random copyright (reform) in Europe" (Eleonora Rosati, University of Southampton and e-LAWnora)* "Patents in perspective" (Stefano Barazza, University of South Wales) * "Policing and enforcing IP" (Marius Schneider, Ipvocate)* "Second medical use claims: why are they so difficult to understand? [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:48 am
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can the police search my car without a warrant? [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
Finally, on question 1 the CJEU rephrased the question of Mr Justice Arnold without any reference to the “reliance” criterion and it answered without any reference to “reliance” either. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
And what’s the relation between that provision and the intermediaries of the E-Commerce Directive? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
requirement, yet the one traditionally favourited by UK courts and indicated by Arnold himself as the preferable approach, lacking specific guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Nestlé v Cadbury: on mixing and matching grounds for exclusion under Article 3(1)(e) Trade Marks DirectiveBack again on the KitKat dispute pending before the CJEU (on which see here, here, here, and here), Mark further reflects upon Attorney General Wathelet's opinion on the second question, which is "Where a shape consists of three essential features, one of which results from the nature of the goods themselves and two of which… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
Flash forward one hundred or so years and look at the recent Pfizer case in England:From Bloomberg:Pfizer Inc. was accused by a U.K. judge of making “groundless threats” of legal action against British doctors and drugstores if they prescribed or sold a generic version of its best-selling Lyrica treatment.Judge Richard Arnold issued the rebuke as he ruled that Allergan Plc’s Actavis unit didn’t infringe Pfizer patents with its version of the drug pregalbin.Pfizer… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:47 am
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can the police search my car without a warrant? [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Mr Justice Arnold's referral to the CJEU of certain questions regarding the application of the Trade Mark Directive in the dispute between Nestlé and Cadbury over Nestlé's application for a trade mark in the shape of its "KitKat" chocolate bar has already been the subject of a number of posts on IPKat (Will Kit Kat shape monopoly last forever? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Sandwich Rehab and HCC 902 East Arnold St. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:24 am
Charlotte Criminal Lawyer Brad Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What is an expungement? [read post]
