Search for: "EEOC v. May and Co., Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Righting for the Supreme Court Majority, Justice Kennedy explained that ERISA expressly pre-empts “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:09 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
He also may elect to keep working and forfeit the package. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Limited, non-exclusive right to republished granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The third case, EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:22 am
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., January 26, 2016, Ripple, K.). [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:31 am
Tuesday Morning, Inc., November 18, 2015, Fuentes, J.). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
” In Thompson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
Iams Co., 486 F.3d 353, 357 (8th Cir.2007 (rotating shift schedule is an essential function); Kallail v. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
Moreover, UPS’s interpretation failed to carry out the important congressional objective in passing the Act—to overturn the Supreme Court’s holding and reasoning in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:19 am
His GINA claim also advanced because neither party sufficiently briefed the issues of whether the doctor who performed a physical was an “agent” of the employer, whether the employer’s receipt of his medical form was inadvertent, and whether the information was actually “genetic information” as defined under GINA (Maxwell v Verde Valley Ambulance Co, Inc, September 10, 2014, Bade, B). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
While the Agencies may possess the authority to lessen the burden of compliance with the regulatory mandates of the ACA by revising regulations, issuing enforcement relief or other certain other actions, these powers do not extend to blocking the authority of participants and beneficiaries to bring suit to enforce the provision of the ACA that the ACA added to ERISA through private benefit denial or breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits brought under ERISA. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
FlightSafety Services Corporation, Co. [read post]
