Search for: "Ex Parte Vs"
Results 361 - 380
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Statistical significance has proven a difficult concept for many judges and lawyers to understand and apply. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:13 pm
Similarly, in an unpublished opinion, the appellate court in Lowhorn vs. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am
Ex. 33. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:19 am
The temporary protection order hearing in an “ex parte” hearing (where only the party seeking the protection order testifies because the other person has not been told about the hearing). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:56 pm
In fact, it's part of the point of his blog. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
And I don't see why any communication necessarily has to be ex parte. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
Once the application is processed, a judge may issue a Temporary Ex Parte Protective Order. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
[2011 (9) SCALE 287], wherein three learned Judges of this Court were called upon to consider as to whether the District Forum and the State Commission as established under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, had the power to recall an ex parte order. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
Raamaselvam & Others Vs. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
The fact that there is no statutory prohibition against the secured creditor taking part in the auction, will not enable them to purchase the property by re-fixing the market price as well as the reserve price and to purchase the property at such reduced rate. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:20 pm
You miss your ex's company. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
Since that date, its stock had pretty much been tracking the Nasdaq (though it ticked up before the close on Friday, as stocks often seem to shortly before a deal; in this case, however, it’s a small enough uptick that it could just be random motion vs. the index). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
There have been three resolved PCC cases since last week: A woman vs Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/03/2012; Mr Simon Plosker vs Financial Times, Clause 1, 14/03/2012; Christine Grahame MSP v Scottish Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/03/2012. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers now excuse their meetings on the ground that there are no rules on ex parte communications in Ecuador. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
ABQB upholds default judgment vs. condo. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Mayfield Hts., 119 Ohio St. 3d 11 (2008); State ex. rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:42 am
Either the financial stresses that led to bankruptcy also break down the marriage, or ex-spouses use bankruptcy as a way to clean-up and get a fresh start after divorce.However, the issue of divorce can weak havoc on bankruptcy, and vice-versa. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Article 102(1) empowers the High Court Division to give directions or orders to any person or authority as may be appropriate to enforce any of the fundamental rights conferred in Part III. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Ex-Law Firm Partner Files Discrimination Complaint against Former Firm Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
Sounds like a pretty straightforward story of David vs. [read post]
