Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
”[16] A federal officer must actually act pursuant to federal authority, and their conduct must bear an objectively reasonable relationship to achieving a federal goal. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
The Davis decision dealt a blow to federal prosecutors who have for three decades wielded § 924(c) as a hammer to attain 25+-year sentences. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
For a copy of the Federal Court of Appeal decision see: Tervita Corporation v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:31 pm
Federal Download Executive v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
Davis is upholding Kentucky law as written by its legislature, and as her oath of office requires. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Greenbaum.In his Introduction, Ted Davis observes that in Matal v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
Pliler and Davis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:03 am
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
Russian Federation Alexia Solomou, Cyprus v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
"Today's Supreme Court decision in Davis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” Yet that is not the doing of the Obergefell Court or the federal Constitution. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:14 pm
Davis, 903 F.3d 483 (5th Cir. 2018); United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 9:24 am
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:22 am
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
He ultimately files a habeas petition that asserts that his counsel was ineffective for not renewing the motion to change venue.So the question on federal habeas (after AEDPA) is: Could a fairminded jurist reasonably conclude that counsel it was a "reasonable trial strategy" not to renew the motion to change venue? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:29 am
Jammie Thomas Judge Hints at Mistrial in RIAA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:58 am
The Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm
Rick cites Davis v. [read post]