Search for: "FIG" Results 361 - 380 of 1,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 1:15 pm
Adding North Korea and Venezuela to the Muslim ban doesn’t even qualify as a fig leaf. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
  U.S. producers saw steeply declining prices (Fig V-13) while the size of the market demand quadrupled (Tab V-19) and their share of total demand declined slightly. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
  U.S. producers saw steeply declining prices (Fig V-13) while the size of the market demand quadrupled (Tab V-19) and their share of total demand declined slightly. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:13 pm by J
I’m also deeply sceptical of the Nat Fed after its (shameful) role in helping create a fig-leaf for the absurdity of the Voluntary Right to Buy scheme; a scheme which, as I may have mentioned before, promised to bring in all of the stupid bits of RTB (like the discount) without any of the protections that come with being a stautory scheme (e.g. because it’ll be a contractual agreement, then misrepresentation problems may arise, unlike under the statutory scheme). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:13 pm by J
I’m also deeply sceptical of the Nat Fed after its (shameful) role in helping create a fig-leaf for the absurdity of the Voluntary Right to Buy scheme; a scheme which, as I may have mentioned before, promised to bring in all of the stupid bits of RTB (like the discount) without any of the protections that come with being a stautory scheme (e.g. because it’ll be a contractual agreement, then misrepresentation problems may arise, unlike under the statutory scheme). [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm by Jelle Hoekstra
In the decision T 488/16, recently discussed in this blog, it became again clear that the EPO is strict in allowing post-published evidence to prove inventive step. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Fig. 1: Screenshot of Docket Alarm’s Gender Diversity Statistics in the PTAB  Gender Analytics in the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by Nico Cordes
It thus encompasses the specific embodiment of Figs. 4 to 6 of document D3, which embodiment is also disclosed in the present application, see the identical Figs. 4 to 6.Since this embodiment is disclosed in P1 (see pages 19 to 21), claim 1 is entitled to the priority of P1 in respect of the specific embodiment. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Based on the intrinsic evidence, however, the "Figure 1" in the patent is composed of Fig. 1A and Fig. 1B. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am by Jim Gerl
I believe that the preliminary fig leaf readings indicate that the Circuits may read the supreme court clarification differently. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:27 am by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
  The July 2017 version of the FIG for data collected in 2018 is available here. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler
When President Trump contends that allowing transgender service “erodes military readiness and unit cohesion,” he is providing the thinnest of fig leaves for the underlying discriminatory reasons that non-trans troops might not want to serve with trans troops. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Based on the intrinsic evidence, however, the "Figure 1" in the patent is composed of Fig. 1A and Fig. 1B. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
The preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in patent Figures [See Fig. 1A above] that are essentially the same as the drawing of the applied-for mark.The patent thus plainly discloses the functional role of the three components disclosed and claimed in Applicant’s drawing of the mark: the conical tower, the helical wings, and the boundary fences affixed to the helical wings. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
T 0578/12: Dispensing restricted products Many features of the claimed invention were disclosed in an earlier patent application. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Scott Slesinger
Whatever the executive order’s fig-leaf phrase “unless prohibited by law” means, its direction to agencies to not adopt new rules unless the agencies comply with its ultra vires requirements remains illegal. [read post]