Search for: "FRYE v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Frye (10-444) — issues parallel  to those in Lafler; the cases are being argued in tandem by order of the Court Tuesday, Nov. 1: Rehberg v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
When the matter reconvened in April 2006, Soule, who had relocated with the child out of state, appeared via telephone. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
Additionally, all state courts have not adopted the Daubert standard yet and still follow their own principles (read Frye) for admissibility of expert testimony. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:55 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Much attention has been paid to the Casey Anthony case – State of Florida v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Brian Frye has an interesting post up over at Concurring Opinions on Friedman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
March 9, 2010) (“the plain language of the statute states that it only applies when the local defendants have been ‘properly joined and served’”); Haseko Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:02 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118, 1127 (Ill. 2002); Frye v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:54 pm by Dan Koewler
  Now, one of the first cases where we raised this argument has finally made its way to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which just accepted review of our case, State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:25 am by SHG
  The first, from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, is United States v. [read post]