Search for: "Fielding v. Superior Court" Results 361 - 380 of 1,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Superior Court, No. 16-466, 582 U.S. ___ (June 19, 2017). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
From 2009 until 2011, she was `in the field’ as a training officer. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Superior Court granted defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment and denied property owners’ cross-motion for summary judgment. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm by Barry Barnett
Superior Court of California, No. 16-466, slip op. at 7 (U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm by Mark Tabakman
Activision Blizzard Inc. et al., and was filed in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court reversed the Kern County Superior Court’s judgment dismissing the action after that court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend based on the asserted res judicata effect on an earlier Alameda County Superior Court judgment. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:15 am by Phillips & Associates
After her return to work, she filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court, asserting claims for sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination, and retaliation under the FEHA. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Cox’s relationship with Superior during the relevant time period was governed by a field services agreement (FSA) between the parties. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 302.) [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:03 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
 If so, then that factor has a big impact on the decision to appeal to the Superior Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 598; Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US District Court did look at non-human authorship some time ago in Naruto v Slater (discussed more here and here), and maintained that non-humans cannot have authorship in works, which has been established some time in the US judiciary (specifically referring to 'humans' or 'persons'). [read post]