Search for: "Flo "
Results 361 - 380
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2018, 9:18 am
About 5 years ago, the singers Flo and Eddie (formerly of the 1960s band the Turtles) started bringing lawsuits throughout the country alleging that they were owed performance royalties under state law for these pre-1972 recordings from both digital and analog services (see our article here when the first suit was filed). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:05 pm
Mophie teamed up with FLO TV to develop the Juice Pack TV for the iPhone 3GS. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:32 am
Racing Radial Cake available at Flo’s V8 Cafe in Disney California Adventure during Pixar Fest. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:18 pm
Go to our Archives and search for “Flo and Eddie”.) [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:22 pm
And, he said he hears about Lucky and Flo a lot. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:31 am
She said that unless Sirius raises any factual issues requiring a trial by December 5th, she will rule outright for the plaintiff, Flo & Eddie Inc, a company controlled by founding Turtles members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, and begin to assess damages. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:11 am
Following on from the actions from Flo & Eddie of the Turtles and and RIAA, it's the third lawsuit that seeks to obtain payment for use of sound recordings under state copyright laws. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:02 pm
Article 17 of the Directive allows Member States to determine “the extent to which, and the conditions under which, such a [copyright] protection is conferred, including the level of originality required” [See the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-168/09 - Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA , for a discussion of the scope of Article 17]. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 11:31 am
Flo & Eddie, a company that represents two members of The Turtles, had claimed that even though there is no federal copyright in sound recordings for pre-1972 songs, they are entitled to payments because their songs are protected by state copyrights and common law. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 4:42 am
"Plaintiffs ask the court to take judicial notice of the order granting summary judgment in Flo & Eddie Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Judges Nathan and Netburn also disagreed with Escape's argument that pre-1972 sound recordings should be excluded, with Judge Nathan citing the recent decision in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:39 am
You can read more on this whole topic, and the current claims brought by Flo & Eddie of the Turtles , the claims brought by the record labels and much much more on pre-1972 copyright legal shenanigans on CMU here. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:38 am
[Other Italian examples: the copyright protection of works of applied art -see Katpost here for a comment on Flos and Cofemel- and more recently the press publishers’ related right - see Katpost here.] [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:24 am
” Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
Court of Appeals in case betwewen sixties pop stars the Turtles (Flo & Eddie - Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman) and SiusXM, contesting the lower court's assertion in dicta that the performance rights being established under common law might apply to broadcast radio as well and arguing that New York state law does not support a common law performance right in sound recordings and saying that upholding such rights would be "impractical and destructive. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
Sir Richard noted that, although he was not indicating any specific preference, the UK might have a discussion around the re-introduction of s52 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA) [which the UK repealed as a consequence of the CJEU Flos decision]. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm
Id. at 703-04; Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
Sir Richard noted that, although he was not indicating any specific preference, the UK might have a discussion around the re-introduction of s52 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA) [which the UK repealed as a consequence of the CJEU Flos decision]. [read post]
