Search for: "General Motors Corporation v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Plaintiff Chavtz Seals, who was injured at work, brought this action asserting a workplace intentional tort claim against defendant General Motors Corporation (GM). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Markman, Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Rand, and others in the Michigan Attorney General's office. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We review a number of significant developments in Delaware corporate law, including the Court of Chancery’s clarification of directors’ oversight duties, and the Delaware General Assembly’s expansion of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law to include exculpation of officers for personal liability arising from breaches of the duty of care. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
General Motors Corp., where “the ‘commercial custom’ of celebrity endorsements in television commercials created an issue of fact as to whether the defendant’s commercial implied the celebrity plaintiff’s endorsement of its product,” or Downing v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Bash the Bentley in brand bust-upBentley 1962 v Bentley Motors [2019] EWHC 2925 (November 2019)This case featured in the first ever volume of Retromark, when Bentley Motors failed to invalidate a UKTM owned by clothing company Bentley Clothing. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In particular, the law requires each gas retailer, under pain of $500/day fines and criminal liability, post a 4″ x 8″ placard on each pump that says: As of July 1, 2022, the state of Illinois has suspended the inflation adjustment to the motor fuel tax through Dec. 31, 2022. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am by Mike Reiner
Judge Mendez’s decision The generally accepted rule is that a corporation which acquires assets of another is not liable for torts of a predecessor corporation except where: 1. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am by Mike Reiner
Judge Mendez’s decision The generally accepted rule is that a corporation which acquires assets of another is not liable for torts of a predecessor corporation except where: 1. [read post]