Search for: "Guise v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 6 July 2017, Dingemans J handed down judgment in the case of Guise v Shah [2017] EWHC 1689 (QB). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:29 am by Richard Samp
Iqbal, that the claims against senior officials failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies  illegally process their personal information. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm
 The meeting then adjourned and articles of amendment containing Proposal 1 were accepted for record by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2017 in the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 645) McCallum J refused leave to plead a claim against the State on the basis of vicarious liability for a statement of the Attorney-General which was republished in the media. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 24 May 2017 in the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 645) McCallum J refused leave to plead a claim against the State on the basis of vicarious liability for a statement of the Attorney-General which was republished in the media. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am by Peter Margulies
This view would have conceded that the President cannot rewrite the elaborate framework of the INA under the guise of invoking authority under the entry provision. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in Guise v Shah before Dingemans J was heard on Monday 8 May 2017 and concluded on 11 May 2017. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
CPLR Article 86, the Equal Access to Justice Act, applies in cases brought against the State for alleged unlawful discrimination within the meaning of the Human Rights LawKimmel v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 03689, Court of AppealsUnder the Equal Access to Justice Act [EAJA; CPLR Article 86] under certain circumstances a court may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff in a suit against the State. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in the case of Guise v Shah was heard by Dingemans J on 2 to 5 May 2017 and is part heard. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
If there were something substantively wrong with Canada’s Patent Act that makes it non-compliant with international law, it could have been challenged in a state to state procedure in the WTO. [read post]