Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
But in Worthy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:49 am
The case of Gaughran v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland was heard by the Supreme Court on 16 October 2014, on appeal from [2012] NIQB 88. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, and Lord Clarke on 22 June 2015 and can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
CrookInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:47 pm
""Omar similarly had ample reason to anticipate being haled into court in the United States on account of his drug trafficking activity in Afghanistan, Dubai, and Ghana. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am
Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Toulson and Lady Hale will hear the appeal. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:12 am
In Chadwick v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Eagle v Chambers The reference to Eagle v Chambers (above) is of particular interest of course because the judgment of the Court of Appeal in that case was delivered by Lady Justice Hale (as she then was). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Doyle v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
Lady Hale and Lord Kerr both gave dissenting judgments (Lady Hale as to outcome, though she agreed with Lord Wilson on the relevant legal principles to be applied; Lord Kerr dissented both on outcome and on the legal approach taken, specifically on the relevant test to be applied by the courts when considering the proportionality of a measure; though both agreed with certain parts of Lord Wilson’s judgment). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Thus Lady Hale summarised the position as follows: The question in all these cases is… is anonymity necessary in the interests of the patient? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:38 am
Contents include:Luke Glanville, The Responsibility to Protect Beyond BordersGamze Erdem Türkelli & Wouter Vandenhole, The Convention on the Rights of the Child: Repertoires of NGO ParticipationBrenda Hale, Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme? [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:38 am
Contents include:Luke Glanville, The Responsibility to Protect Beyond BordersGamze Erdem Türkelli & Wouter Vandenhole, The Convention on the Rights of the Child: Repertoires of NGO ParticipationBrenda Hale, Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme? [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:52 am
I had been following this case--Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am
Three judges (Hale, Wilson, Clarke) retain the traditional broad common law view – the position in many Canadian provinces prior to Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (available here) – that ongoing suffering in the forum in respect of a tort that happened abroad is sufficient. [read post]
