Search for: "Hand v. Roberts" Results 361 - 380 of 5,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Writers at Slate and Vox push out a never-ending series of attacks on a handful of district court judges in Texas. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
  But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:22 am by Tessa Shepperson
A free webinar: The Supreme Court has now handed down its decision in the case of Rakusen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
As Judge Learned Hand declared almost 100 years ago, “[a]rgument is argument whether in the box or at the bar, and its proper place is the last. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's decision by Judge Robert Pitman in Fund Texas Choice v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In Optis v Apple, Meade J explained that the date of hand-down itself is not necessarily confidential. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
”[8] The formula provided is correct, but the interpretation of a 95% probability that the interval covers the true parameter is unequivocably wrong.[9] The third edition’s chapter by Shari Seidman Diamond on survey research, on the other hand, gave an anodyne example and a definition: “A survey expert could properly compute a confidence interval around the 20% estimate obtained from this sample. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
 However, Meade J identified that on the other hand, one can imagine situations where it would seem necessary to take account of novelty-only art to get to the correct result. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Some courts would forgive you according to your lawful trading motives, some would convict you in keeping with your bad motives, and some would hand the issue to the jury. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
To date, only a handful of books about Wilson have been published. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
From the inception of the federal securities laws, companies could choose to offer to the broad investing public by taking on substantial disclosure obligations in exchange for exclusive access to the relatively unlimited pool of public capital; private companies, on the other hand, had to raise capital from insiders or certain large financial institutions, and were subject to restrictions on transfer and resale.[5] Private markets were meant to be the exception to the proverbial rule. [read post]