Search for: "Imperial v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
United States, which he characterizes as having “effectively legalized racial profiling of drivers by police. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Hint: not Jack Goldsmith's The Terror Presidency (2007) or Charlie Savage's Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency (2007). [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:11 am
I conclude with a short summary of the most salient points and with suggestions to direct legal theory away from its current state of lethargy towards a new beginning (V). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Take for example the recent Alberta decisions in Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In Imperial Chemical Industries PLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
The constitutionality of the plain packaging law was challenged in Australia by tobacco companies including British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Philip Morris on the ground that their intellectual property was being acquired by the State on other than just terms. [4]However, the seven judge bench of the Australian High Court has ruled that the plain packaging laws are not unconstitutional on that ground. [read post]