Search for: "In Matter of Crouch" Results 361 - 380 of 869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Gerlitz, APPEAL 2017-002398, 2018 WL 619852 (PTAB Jan. 26, 2018) GlucoVista’s patent application claims a method of determining glucose concentration in a body (i.e., physical matter) by changing the body’s surface temperature and measuring the change in infrared (IR) radiation emitted at the wavelength associated with Glucose IR emissions. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:37 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In a split opinion, the Federal Circuit has affirmed Core Wireless win over LG Electronics [DECISION] – finding the asserted patent claimed eligible subject matter and refusing to disturb the district court’s judgment of no-anticipation and infringement. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:38 am by Andrew Hamm
Crouch was highly praised by early 19th-century elites (especially Chief Justice John Marshall) for his mint juleps and pigs seasoned with mustard, cayenne pepper and mushroom ketchup. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Elena Chachko
Notably, this is not how the UN Committee against Torture understood the matter in its concluding observations on Israel’s fifth periodic report to the committee. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Sweetland, The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Recommendations to the International Trade Commission (ITC):  Unsound, Unmeasured, and Unauthoritative, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (levi.ftcunsound.pdf) Kevin Emerson Collins, An Initial Comment on King Pharmaceuticals: The Printed Matter Doctrine as a Structural Doctrine and Its Implications for Prometheus Laboratories, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 111 (Collins.KingPharma.pdf) Robert A. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 10:21 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Each of these decisions resulted, at least initially, in an increase in subject-matter rejections by the USPTO in the corresponding fields of endeavour. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 187-88 (1981) (“The ‘novelty’ of any element or steps in a process, or even of the process itself, is of no relevance in determining whether the subject matter of a claim falls within the § 101 categories of possibly patentable subject matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:27 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch A new decision from the 5th Circuit includes an interesting analysis of federal preemption. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Louisiana.October 31, 2017.Joan Baye, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine Zabetti Crouch, Crouch Law, LLC.Midland Credit Management, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew W. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Louisiana.October 31, 2017.Joan Baye, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine Zabetti Crouch, Crouch Law, LLC.Midland Credit Management, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew W. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
 (Aug. 2012) David Hricik, Why Section 101 is Neither a “Condition of Patentability” nor an Invalidity Defense (2013) Dennis Crouch, Can a Third Party Challenge Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility in the USPTO’s new Post-Grant Review Procedure? [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s decision in Two-Way Media is in some amount of tension with the court’s 2016 decision in Amdocs v. [read post]