Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S." Results 361 - 380 of 762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 1:24 pm by Steven Tabano
If you don’t meet the 10-year marriage rule, you can still qualify for benefits if all of the following are true: – you’re caring for your ex-husband’s natural or legally adopted child – the child is under age 16, or disabled, and – the child is getting benefits on your ex-husband’s work record. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:24 pm by Steven Tabano
If you don’t meet the 10-year marriage rule, you can still qualify for benefits if all of the following are true: - you’re caring for your ex-husband’s natural or legally adopted child - the child is under age 16, or disabled, and - the child is getting benefits on your ex-husband’s work record. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
And the fact that Congress adopted by statute something that the court refused to adopt as a matter of constitutional command doesn’t matter. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am by Jim Sedor
Tom Corbett’s re-election bid – from casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, a blunder that appears to breach the state’s gaming act. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:23 am by Tom Goldstein
  Like our recent posts on Justice Stevenss testimony in the Senate, Amy’s post is part of our effort to cover congressional developments that are closely related to the Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Steven Dorff (actor who has emphysema). [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Wins $2.57 Million Ruling Over 'Wizard of Oz' Merchandise http://t.co/XZojzmsrMs -> Broadcasters have to pay for ephemeral copies: ESA didn't overrule Bishop v Stevens, CBC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am by Barry Sookman
Aereo’s business model of re-transmitting TV broadcasts without a license is being challenged in the SCOTUS by US studios and broadcasters. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
In Wednesday’s post, I discussed how many of these roadblocks fall away if you’re in a private prison. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
  After all this time we had frankly thought the Court to be irretrievably split 3-3, with the newly appointed interim justice, Stevens, recused due to his participation at the Superior Court level. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:19 am by Juan Antúnez
Here’s how the 1st DCA explained this point, relying heavily on a similar 1986 case out of Arizona: [I]n In re Strobel, 149 Ariz. 213, 717 P.2d 892, 893–94 (1986), Mr. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Schachtman
  The Superior Court panel, consisting of Judges Stevens, Lazarus, and Colville, largely adopted Judge Moss’s analysis and affirmed in a signed, but unpublished, opinion by Judge Lazarus. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:58 am by Ronald Mann
  So, Justice Sotomayor commented: “You’re saying that it’s illegal to use that person’s products. [read post]