Search for: "In Re Doe, III" Results 361 - 380 of 4,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
  The Delaware courts have issued a number of decisions in the past several years, including In re Rural Metro Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
The FDA does not set a minimum safety standard when it declares a medical device to be "substantially equivalent. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Individuals generally receive such coverage in one of four ways:  (i) through Medicaid, if they’re eligible; (ii) through Medicare, if they’re eligible; (iii) through an employer-provided insurance plan, if their employer offers one; or (iv) on the government “exchange,” if the individual is not covered in one of the other three ways. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  People simply do what they’re going to do, or work around it. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:00 am by Gene Takagi
Proc. 2018-32 – Nonprofit Quarterly: “What does it mean for America’s nonprofit sector to lead bravely and ethically? [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by familoo
”, which I have always (until Re H) considered represent an adequate summary of “conduct of litigation” (i and ii) and rights of audience (iii). [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Alex Loomis
” Judge Kavanaugh additionally argued that Bahlul’s conviction does not violate Article III because he has no constitutional right to a jury trial if no such right was available in military commissions as a matter of historical practice. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:16 am
We hold that all sworn officers of the IPD or MCSD at the time of consolidation satisfied the oath requirement for officers in the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD). * * * We now turn to the issue at hand: whether Indiana law requires an officer to be re-sworn upon consolidation of a city police department and a county sheriff's department or whether the officer's sworn status carries forward to this newly consolidated entity. * * * The legislature's… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm by Dykema
Spokeo may allow more companies to dismiss spurious claims against them based upon nebulous statutory violations where there is no actual harm or injury- even when the statute itself does not require actual harm. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Steve Baird
Does Stellabrate make you want to throw a party? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
But, for the reasons explained, the Commerce Clause does not give Congress that power. [read post]