Search for: "In Re EG"
Results 361 - 380
of 821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 12:19 am
If you can’t understand it, and the agent seems to be rushing you to sign without explaining it – then this is a bad sign and you need to re-consider using this agency. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:03 pm
If you have had to get another contractor to re-do the work then I think you are entitled to seek compensation from the agents of the extra costs you have incurred. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 11:08 am
We also don't know about editing of any of the koala selfies (eg by cropping, colouring, re-positioning): if there has been editorial input, this might again pass a copyright to a human. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:32 pm
This becomes an interesting avenue to transmogrify "purchased opinions" into something which can be treated as facts.A separate consequence will be re-evaluation of a party stipulating to infringement to seek review at the CAFC (eg, Gevo v Butamax). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:21 pm
The relationship between this new Law and the Special 301 Report can be seen in the cables leaked by WikiLeaks, eg here and here.After this, even though new levels of protection were in place, the most relevant point, the provision of links to P2P networks, still was not treated as a criminal offence under Spanish law, as we can see in the famous cases of Sharemula(2008) and Pablo Soto(2014). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
Can Companies with Counterproposals Just Exclude Them & See If They’re Sued By the Proponent? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 2:52 pm
But we fear that most Ghostery desktop users think they're being protected when they are not. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
" [para 186]There is no need to recall that the way Member States have transposed this provision into their own copyright laws varies, with some Member States, eg the UK, deciding initially not to take full advantage of the scope of this exception. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 5:28 am
As IPKat readers might know, following the attack to the offices of satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, debate has ensued regarding the opportunity or not of reprinting its irreverent cartoons.While Belgian newspaper L'Echo, and a number of German and Italian publications have re-printed a number of covers of this French newspaper [see here for a broader collection], both major US, eg The New York Times, and UK… [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
NSSTA considers engaging in or promoting the marketing or distribution of re-cycled payment rights to be risky, confusing and unregulated investment activity and inconsistent with its Mission. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
The claimed structure was in error, due to a re-arrangement taking place unbeknownst to the inventors. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Baker J considered the guidance in Re EC (Disclosure of Material) [1996] 2 FLR 725 CA, noting that whilst the balance as between the factors identified in the 10-point guidance of Swinton-Thomas LJ in that case may have shifted following the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, the guidance remained valid and Re EC remains the leading authority. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
Saxony later successfully sued the city of Querfurt for depicting it on souvenirs.Turning to titles of books, these may be descriptive but can be registered as trade marks if they're not. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
App. 1988) (yes, that’s the Swaggart you’re thinking of). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
For example, if a family with kids and a CSR-eligible income is shopping for coverage, they’re not going to see CSR plans in the browsing tool nor will they see CSR plans in any quotes. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 8:55 am
(eg.) [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:19 pm
It’s all very well to be able to recite the law, but unless you can make it relevant to my business, you’re wasting my time and money. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:33 pm
They included (i) Jeremy's difficulty in sticking to the script, (ii) the absence of a lectern in one venue meaning that he couldn't see the script properly anyway, (iii) the diverse nature of the audiences (eg almost all the Canberra audience worked for IP Australia; there were no conspicuous economists in Sydney) and (iv) the fact that each subsequent lecture tended to incorporate comments made or fresh thoughts generated in the one which preceded it. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:35 am
Fazit Für die EU wäre zu wünschen, dass eine Harmonisierung zu Gunsten der Panoramafreiheit erfolgt. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm
If Sarkeesian enrages you, don't let anyone show you Foucault or Derrida or you're going to have an aneurysm. [read post]
