Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 361 - 380
of 893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
Judge Johnson’s judicial handiwork received non-deferential appellate review from a three-judge panel of the Appellate Division, which reversed the exclusion of Kornbluth and Madigan. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
In re Baycol Products Litig., ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:27 pm
The ISMP also expressed concern that an FDA medical reviewer recommended not approving Nuplazid for Parkinson’s treatment but that his concerns were overruled. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See In re A.H. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:12 am
The Supreme Court rejected cert review. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
After reading Holly's review, I wished I would have gotten an invitation. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Below the jump, find the transcript of my interview with Assistant Professor Jennifer Laurin from the UT law school, who spoke with Grits on Tuesday about prosecutorial oversight in anticipation of a panel discussion at 1:30 p.m. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm
CMS proposes to streamline documentation requirements by allowing the physician, PA, or advanced practice registered nurse who furnishes and bills for his or her professional services to review and verify — rather than fully re-document — information included in the medical record by physicians, residents, nurses, students or other members of the medical team. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:40 am
"We're not asking that the carriers stop issuing network cards," Rontiris said. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
John Elwood reviews the latest relists, with the musical assistance of a retired elf. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:30 pm
Any invoices for payment of medical expenses should be sent to this person unless you’re told otherwise. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:31 pm
Another possibility is that they have reviewed the report and they’re taking some time to determine what to do. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:42 am
As you are selecting or reviewing your panel provider for occupational health, CALL the center and speak to the administrator. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
If you’re familiar with the Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, then you know that it wasn’t always the beautiful community it is today. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
In this webinar, Paradigm and our panel of clinical experts will discuss what we have learned about this unpreceded disease and explore the unique categories of post-COVID conditions. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
(Two require medical attention.) [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” We reviewed over 120 cases in controversial areas in which Gruender either wrote or joined in an 8th Circuit opinion. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:24 pm
You’ll get an indication from an employer that they are looking to review your ongoing employment with them after 52 weeks if they ask you for your permission for them to obtain medical material from your treating medical practitioner, usually your GP. [read post]
