Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 361 - 380 of 987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
If the Federal Circuit had changed the law on this, the Supreme Court would have heard the case. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:52 am by Michael Lowe
In fact, a thermal imaging device being used by the police was the basis of a case that made its way all the way up to the United States Supreme Court back in 2001. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Haryana, (2016) 2 SCC 445, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India has strongly rejected the doctrine of substantive due process. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  On its face, Reed could and maybe should reach ©, public school grades, commercial speech, etc. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 11:28 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
A quick search of MOUs involving courts outside of China reveals one between the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Courts of the Dubai International Financial Courts,  between the Supreme Court of Indonesia and the Federal Court and Family Court of Australia, and other similar  agreements. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 10:38 am by Dennis Crouch
The appellate court agreed and vacated its prior summary affirmance (although not the district court’s opinion) and remanded to the district court to consider the impact of the reexamination changes. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The following statement by our Supreme Court clearly makes this prior finding of insanity not dispositive.A prior adjudication of an issue in a criminal matter is not res judicata or estoppel by judgment to a subsequent civil action involving the same fact issue. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The court publicly censured Judge Shannon and suspended him without pay for thirty days.In In re Merritt, 431 Mich. 1211, the Michigan Supreme Court censured the judge who “fined” attorneys for lateness, untimely filings, etc., and then used the money to offset the cost of a fund that he created to help indigent drug and alcohol abusers who appeared before the court (a little like Robin Hood). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, in reviewing Pfizer’s challenge, saw that Murphy’s opinion essentially was determined by (1), (2), and (3), above. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:43 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In our opinion, however, such assurances are better enforced through contract principals (e.g., warranties, indemnities, etc.) rather than fraud claims. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s inference from the letter that there was a “substantial unanimity of action” among the letter’s writer and its addressees. [read post]