Search for: "In Re Presentment to Superior Court" Results 361 - 380 of 2,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 5:36 pm by Stephen M. Ozcomert
If you were injured in a trip and fall, it is very important to retain an experienced attorney who can help you obtain the damages to which you’re entitled. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
”[ii]  For many contemporary jurors, Professor Sutherland’s observations from eighty years ago would prescient: the wrongdoing of “present-day white-collar criminals” shows up in “investigations of land offices, railways, insurance, munitions, banking, public utilities, stock exchanges, the oil industry, real estate, reorganization committees, receiverships, bankruptcies, and politics. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:45 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”As an update it is noted that the Pennsylvania Superior Court has withdrawned this decision in favor of a re-argument en banc on the issues presented. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 5:27 am by Minick Law
And therefore, I will not speak to any because there haven’t been any presented by the state in regards to mitigation,” and then you move on, but you’re pointing out to the court that it would be unwarranted in that particular situation for there to be anything other than a level five sentence issued, as long as you present a legitimate mitigating factor, because why? [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
That's why standing is separate from the merits: because courts have to wait for a certain kind of case to weigh in, even if what they're waiting to say is true. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regardless of how described, such defenses are usually unsuccessful, as courts prefer to support the public policy of securities compliance even if an “undeserving” investor benefits with a financial windfall from Recession. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm by admin
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am by Schachtman
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:40 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, November 10, 2020, at 11:00 a.m.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold the fourth hearing in its series of hearings on the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
So today we’re going to talk about five tips for district court practice. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:49 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
R Street strives to provide a compensation package superior to those at other think tanks and nonprofits. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:04 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, October 26, 2020 at 8:00 p.m.: Yale Law School will host a book talk on the U.S. president and immigration law. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
We’re a small and flexible team where everyone does a little bit of everything, but your primary job on a daily basis will be conducting research and policy advocacy at the intersection of technology, data protection, and equity. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here, the Court permits Pelletier on re-trial to freely pontificate about his being "slandered" by the charges because he would "never" commit such an act, knowing he is insulated from the State's rebuttal of his testimony by reference to the prior investigation into past similar conduct. [read post]