Search for: "In Re Senior Appeals Examiners" Results 361 - 380 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Duell OK, now that you’re warmed up, no more softballs. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
It is also noteworthy that in issuing the denials, the USCIS examiner also took pains to note that -- because the proposed positions fall within one of the occupations listed in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) -- there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the position of Senior Quality Assurance Engineer involved “a special or advanced level of knowledge in the dynamic decision making turnkey solutions field or related occupation. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
It is also noteworthy that in issuing the denials, the USCIS examiner also took pains to note that -- because the proposed positions fall within one of the occupations listed in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) -- there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the position of Senior Quality Assurance Engineer involved “a special or advanced level of knowledge in the dynamic decision making turnkey solutions field or related occupation. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
It is also noteworthy that in issuing the denials, the USCIS examiner also took pains to note that — because the proposed positions fall within one of the occupations listed in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) — there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the position of Senior Quality Assurance Engineer involved “a special or advanced level of knowledge in the dynamic decision making turnkey solutions field or related… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:20 am by assoulineberlowe
Then we have jury selection, opening statements, direct and cross examination (and possibly redirect and re-cross), and closing statements, jury instructions, jury deliberations, and a then final judgment. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:47 pm by Ravi S. Nagi
  Senior Circuit Judge Dolores Korman Sloviter wrote the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Guest Blogger
The seminars I conducted for senior judges and lawyers allowed the whole of the Evidence Code to be examined and reported on at each seminar. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am by David Bernstein
When I first started trying cases, senior trial lawyers instructed me not to engage plaintiffs’ expert witnesses on substantive issues, but to limit cross-examination to “collateral attack” on bias and related issues. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
The case has now been appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals by The Authors Guild. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am by Schachtman
  When I first started trying cases, senior trial lawyers instructed me not to engage plaintiffs’ expert witnesses on substantive issues, but to limit cross-examination to “collateral attack” on bias and related issues. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by S2KM Limited
Brenston Case - The Illinois Supreme Court denied Peachtree Settlement Funding's petition for appeal of the 4th District Illinois Court of Appeals' decision in the Settlement Funding v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
 Is the delay in the appeal and post-conviction remedy process cruel and unusual? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:16 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Vanderbilt physician examined her twice during July 2009, determined she was able to return to work without restrictions, and sent a letter so stating to the employee on September 2, 2009, which she promptly turned over to her employer. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
  Two federal Courts of Appeals have now held 2-1 that the First Amendment does not protect Electronic Arts’ depiction of actual college players, so that EA may be held liable under state right of publicity laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:09 pm by Prashant Reddy
Why not wait until the samples could be retested – what was the hurry to allow NATCO to re-enter the market? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court of appeals reversed, noting first that this was a reverse confusion case. [read post]