Search for: "In re Michael G." Results 361 - 380 of 953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Biorenewable monomers take centre stage (IPKat) US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit extends scope of 102(e) ‘secret prior art’: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) (Patentology) (Inventive Step) District Court erroneously gives claim term two different constructions in a single claim: Haemonetics Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
(lctjk1) (Entered: 11/27/2017) 11/27/2017 9  Memorandum in opposition to re 2 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
(lctjk1) (Entered: 11/27/2017) 11/27/2017 9  Memorandum in opposition to re 2 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” Welcome, Michael, and thank you for participating in this question-and-answer exchange. * * * “Have you got any candidates? [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:26 pm by Sofia Lopez Bancalari
En effet, la réponse ne s’est pas fait attendre : le 23 juillet 2016, Michael Skidmore, qui gère la succession du regretté Randy Wolfe, mieux connu sous le nom de Randy California du groupe Spirit, a porté en appel cette décision du 9ème circuit de la cour californienne. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Some Past Attempts to Remedy the Harm from Dubious Science in Products Cases GAF’s Litigation against the Asbestos Lawsuit Industry On January 10, 2001, G-I Holdings Inc., the successor to GAF Corporation (“GAF”), filed suit against a group of asbestos personal injury lawyers who it alleged had “orchestrated a scheme to inundate the judicial system with hundreds of thousands of asbestos cases without regard to their merit. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
Re-analyses can be important, but these reanalyses of published Bendectin studies were post hoc, litigation driven, and obviously result oriented. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango)   Canada EU’s IP negotiating strategy with Canada leaks: Calls 2009 copyright consult a ‘tactic to confuse’ (Michael Geist) Submissions on Canada-EU trade deal: Canadian publishers’ council seek term extension, database protection (Michael Geist) US Ambassador to Canada: No link between copyright and buy American laws (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Federal Court: Book titles unregistrable as trademarks in Canada: Drolet v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Geist
The post The Canadian Privacy and Civil Liberties Punch in the Gut (or Why CSE/CSIS Oversight is Not Enough) appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:10 am by Amanda Sloat
Incidentally, Erdoğan collaborated with Gülen to purge such officials before the erstwhile allies turned on each other. [read post]