Search for: "In the Matter of the Parenting and Support of: G." Results 361 - 380 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
[We turn to the parents’] contention that the scheme is unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 12:53 pm by Georgialee Lang
Zhu was cited by the court in G.K.D. v C.S.D, 2021 BCSC 367 where the parties were engaged in 14 days of trial to deal with parenting issues, property and support. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:30 am
For many years these sections have expressly authorized the invocation of equitable estoppel in paternity and child support matters in the Family Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Russell Knight
How do these child custody concepts; parenting time and parental decision-making get decided in an Illinois divorce or parentage matter? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the instant matter the Presentment Agency called seven witnesses. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
To order child support, Illinois divorce courts must “determine each [spouse/]parent’s monthly net income” 750 ILCS 505(a)(1.5)(A) Determining income for the purpose of ordering maintenance works exactly the same as the child support income determination. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Finally, Judge Woods also found that he “cannot conclude as a matter of law that the Counterclaims fall within the scope of exclusions 4(g). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
  Iran has also been linked to support for al-Qa'ida and has permitted al-Qa'ida to transport funds and fighters through Iran to Syria and South Asia. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
Authentication is testimonial “evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Moore 13-103Issue: Whether law-enforcement agents accused of retaliatory prosecution in violation of the First Amendment should receive qualified immunity where the officers could reasonably have believed that the prosecution was supported by probable cause. [read post]