Search for: "Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed" Results 361 - 380 of 1,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
COA18-1011 Filed: 1 October 2019 Mecklenburg County, No. 14 CVD 13699 RICHARD OWEN SHIREY, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
Barton v City of Norwalk, 2017 WL 2806277 (CT 7/4/2017)Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Uncategorized [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:55 pm by Sam Turco
This is the background in the case of Kountze v Domina Law Group decided by the Nebraska Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:55 pm by Sam Turco
This is the background in the case of Kountze v Domina Law Group decided by the Nebraska Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:04 pm
Supreme Court picked up Burke’s language in a 2001 case called Cook v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 2:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
From footnote 5 The district court incorrectly concluded that Example 4 plays no role in the indefiniteness inquiry. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
Friends of McMillan Park v DC Zoning Commission, 2016 WL 7174662 (DC App. 12/8/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Historic Preservation, Planned Development Districts, Uncategorized [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 am by Jim Singer
The new court decision, Exelixis v Kappos, involved a case where the USPTO limited PTA in a patent because the applicant filed a request for continued examination (RCE) while the patent was pending. [read post]