Search for: "Kane v. Kane"
Results 361 - 380
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2012, 5:53 pm
LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:49 am
The requirement of full financial disclosure is so axiomatic to the family court process that one has to go back almost three decades to locate a case, Kane v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Further, plaintiff failed to show how the alleged malpractice caused any such damages since the Letter of Intent was not a binding contract but merely "effectuated the intent of the parties" (Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C., 63 AD3d 529, 531[2009]). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 4:53 am
This problem came into sharp focus in Staten Island last month, while the legal profession was on vacation, in Kane v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
" Young v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:46 am
Last week I was critical of the 8th District’s decision in Strongsville v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:29 am
Docs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
Kane is also troublesome. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:01 am
See Palmer Kane LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm
" “As a result of a guilty plea, bargained for or otherwise, and the concomitant waiver of the right to trial by jury, a criminal defendant also waives his rights to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, to present evidence, to compel the attendance of witnesses, and to require prosecutors to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt,” Kane writes in an analysis that cites heavily to the Supreme Court’s recent opinion n Lafler v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court granted review and essentially agreed with the Kane opinion. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:39 am
But Sean Kane, president of Safety Research and Strategies, is worried. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
County of Kane, 308 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2002), which had concluded that class certification should be decided before standing, based on dictum of the Supreme Court in Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 7:17 am
Ruff v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
Today, in Coito v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
