Search for: "Kates v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 9:30 pm by Brandi Lupo
The Supreme Court’s decision in Harper & Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
  In any case, it seems that zombification comes from ingesting, as stated by article 246 of the Haitian Criminal Code, “substances which, without giving death, will cause a more-or-less prolonged state of lethargy. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Benjamin Bissell
Kate Brannen of Foreign Policy writes that ISIS is busy on another front: inculcating a new generation of Islamist militants. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* The UPC and Investor–State Arbitration The creation of a unitary patent title and a common court (‘UPC’) to litigate patent infringement in Europe raises, among other things, questions of international IP law. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Our own Kate Fort has posted her paper, “Observing Change: The Indian Child Welfare Act and State Courts,” published in the New York State Bar Association Family Law Review earlier this year. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
The settlement of a libel claim brought by Gerry and Kate McCann against the Sunday Times was announced. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The libel claim brought in Portugal by Kate and Gerry McCann against former police officer, Goncalo Amaral has been adjourned for the fourth time. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:36 am by Patrick Goold
Rub, Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal (forthcoming, 2015)In 2013, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail has printed an apology to the author JK Rowling in which it states that it has paid her substantial damages over an article that claimed she had told a misleading “sob story. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]