Search for: "L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS INC."
Results 361 - 380
of 858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Similarly, inquiry about communications the expert had with anyone other than the party’s counsel about the opinions expressed is unaffected by the rule. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:08 pm
By Gerald L. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
(Reviewing Steven Hawley, Recovering a Lost River: Removing Dams, Rewilding Salmon, Revitalizing Communities.) 41 Envtl. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
That hypothesis must, of course, then be tested and supported by appropriate analytical methods before it can be accepted for general causation and as a putative specific cause in a particular individual. 3. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
The idea of holding responsible those who help others commit unlawful acts is not unique to copyright law. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for July, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 1:36 pm
The Honorable Calvin L. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Matthew Sciabacucchi In March, Justice Karen L. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Relying upon pre-2000 Ninth Circuit case law, decided before the statutory language of Rule 702 was adopted, the court found that: “expert evidence is inadmissible where the analysis is the result of a faulty methodology or theory as opposed to imperfect execution of laboratory techniques whose theoretical foundation is sufficiently accepted in the scientific community to pass muster under Daubert. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
Colorado: In an October 12, 2011, the District of Colorado issued a decision (L-3 Communications Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am
L. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
” AND L ab. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Ohio Reg'l Transit Auth. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Virginia analysis due to its subjective view that those inferences do not “more likely than not flow from” the trial evidence should be reversed given that it conflicts with this Court's holdings that a federal habeas court conducting a Jackson review must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, presume that the jury resolved any conflicting factual inferences in favor of the prosecution, and defer to that resolution; (3) whether the court… [read post]
