Search for: "L-3 Communications Holdings Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Similarly, inquiry about communications the expert had with anyone other than the party’s counsel about the opinions expressed is unaffected by the rule. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
(Reviewing Steven Hawley, Recovering a Lost River: Removing Dams, Rewilding Salmon, Revitalizing Communities.) 41 Envtl. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  That hypothesis must, of course, then be tested and supported by appropriate analytical methods before it can be accepted for general causation and as a putative specific cause in a particular individual. 3. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
The idea of holding responsible those who help others commit unlawful acts is not unique to copyright law. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for July, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Relying upon pre-2000 Ninth Circuit case law, decided before the statutory language of Rule 702 was adopted, the court found that: “expert evidence is inadmissible where the analysis is the result of a faulty methodology or theory as opposed to imperfect execution of laboratory techniques whose theoretical foundation is sufficiently accepted in the scientific community to pass muster under Daubert. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by Russell Beck
Colorado: In an October 12, 2011, the District of Colorado issued a decision (L-3 Communications Corporation v. [read post]