Search for: "MATTER OF A F" Results 361 - 380 of 26,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
If so, what information should be provided or exchanged as a practical matter to make negotiation more efficient and transparent? [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:56 am
"Förstemann’s thighs, each comparable to a watermelon, measured 34 inches — wider than his waist. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
As reported in The Star-Ledger, The Advisory Committee on Judicial Misconduct charged that Superior Court Judge F. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
” As for the remaining copyright-based takedown notice, the court says it doesn’t matter that BAYC didn’t have a copyright registration for the work at issue because unregistered works are still protectable. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 6:26 am by Kevin Wickliffe
” In addition,”[i]t does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Interpreting what the word “found” means in 17 USC 512(g). * In the Matter of Subpoena of Internet Subscribers of Cox Communications, LLC and Coxcom LLC, 2023 WL 6907124 (D. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1986) and In re Ludtke,441 F.2d 660, 664 (CCPA 1971)).ANDit is not necessary for the prior artto serve the same purpose as that disclosed in Appellant’s Specification inorder to support the conclusion that the claimed subject matter would havebeen obvious.55 See In re Linter, 458 F.2d 1013, 1016 (CCPA 1972). [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Applicant has the burden of proving unexpected results inhere in the claimed subject matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“If any claim limitation is absent from the accused device, there is no literal infringement as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Peter Conti-Brown
The Regulatory Review pays tribute to Judge Stephen F. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Sarett, 327 F.2d 1005, 1014, 1015, 140 USPQ 474, 482, 483 (CCPA 1964). [read post]